Are MOOCs a harbinger of the upgraded future?

I don’t think so.

Distance learning is not a new concept. Open University in the UK was established in 1969 and was built exclusively as a distance learning institution. Although it is a research institute and has its physical campus, the majority of students are learning off-class. Now times have changed, and the Internet enhanced the experience of distance learning. With our computers, we can enroll in any course we find online for free with a click of a mouse and learn, without interruptions from our routines.

MOOCs is the term for a group of facilities that provide online courses. The abbreviation stands for Massive Open Online Courses, with the most recognizable brands being Coursera, edX, Udemy Free Courses, etc. Numerous websites collected the list of MOOCs for our convenience (example 1, example 2, example 3).

MOOCs are great in the way that they allow a student to enjoy his or her power of freedom–time management, flexible deadlines (or lack thereof, if one does not intend to get a certificate upon completion), affordable and limited participation, no need to commute, what have you.

Technologically speaking, yes–MOOCs are a harbinger of the upgraded future. But learningwise, is this the way to go? Perhaps not. MOOCs lack the oh-so-necessary human factor in education. Peter Struck, whose course on Ancient Greek and Roman mythology I tried to take for three times on Coursera (but failed to complete), said in his interview to Huffington Post: “Where you have a back-and-forth, interrogating each other ideas, finding shades of gray in each other’s ideas, I don’t know how much of that you can do in a MOOC” (Pope, 2013). Indeed, one cannot involve all other senses that are there in the classroom if he or she sits in his own house and it is not for sure paying enough attention or being interested in keeping the conversation going.

MOOCs have not yet shown the general public is ready for them. Nick Morrison in his article on the Forbes website mentioned that drop-out rates are high, feedback is obscure, and academic integrity is very much in question (Morrison, 2014). He argued, rather, that MOOCs can provide the knowledge for which there is no place in a traditional classroom (Morrison, 2014). In that sense, MOOCs can satisfy the need for information that one craves for but does not find in a school curriculum, which shows that motivational factors play a huge role for students.

To conclude, I want to say that the topic — MOOCs and the Future — is fascinating and has many dimensions to it. In further posts, I’m planning to look into whether online courses should or should not be free, whether it should or should not give out certificates, what role instructors play in them, whether MOOCs’ credits should be transferable in actual institutions of higher learning, and more.

Take care.


Morrison, Nick. (2014, June 25). The future of MOOCs in the classroom. Forbes. Retrieved from

Pope, Justin. (2013, January 20). MOOCs gaining popularity, but new frontier for scaling up online classes is course credit. Huffington Post. Retrieved from


4 thoughts on “Are MOOCs a harbinger of the upgraded future?

  1. This is really interesting! I had no clue what MOOCs were or what it stood for, but once you described it I remembered signing up for a course on Coursera. I thought it was really cool because lets say you needed to learn something new in your field, instead of enrolling at a university, you can easily take a course that in many cases are free on sites like these and learn a new skill for work. I thought it was cool but I did drop that course so when you mention that there is a high drop out rate that seemed to make sense. There is just not enough at stake to make it feel like its necessary to complete the entire course especially if you are not getting a certificate. I am interested in learning more from your blog.

    -April Jenkins

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I think when knowledge is offered for free, one need to be intrinsically highly motivated to take advantage of it. In regular university system there is monetary burden that works as a potent external motivation. And I totally agree with your observation related to human factor in education.
    Just as side note, I am not in your group, however I was interested in MOOC so, I got interested in your blog.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s